Tag Cloud

Main Federal Immigration Health Mental Health Indigenous Environment Housing
asd
.... Gossip Finance Justice


Come to indigenous news to stay informed about FedProv policies, programs, and initiatives aimed at supporting indigenous peoples and preserving their cultures and rights. From land rights to economic development, cultural revitalization to education initiatives, this site will have the latest updates.


Great Bipartisan Success in Indigenous Affairs

2024-02-21 8:00 PM
Fresh Reporting: Kaz Kittmer

Indigenous Affairs worked tirelessly today to continue to pass legislation. Despite the Wild West press diligently reporting on the meeting the previous day, Alberta decided to ask for the Wild West press to be removed from the first meeting due to certain unrelated circumstances. From the limited amount of information available to the press member, the rest of the meeting progressed civilly as with previous meetings. After the meeting had concluded the Wild West press member was approached by representatives of the Assembly of First Nations who expressed their dismay at the removal of the press organization.

Upon the start of the second meeting, the Wild West press member was asked to be removed again by Alberta. Federal representatives decided it was in the session's best interest to remove the Wild West press from the meeting. Soon after members of the Alberta congagent and members of the Wild West press participated in a formal apology regarding the misinformation and press removal. This apology allowed all previously removed Wild West press members to return to the committee meetings they were reporting on.

All proposed bills were signed by the Indigenous Affairs ministers. Despite the conflicts in other ministries, Indigenous Affairs achieved all its set goals within its committee meetings. Opinions were fully respected and many present seemed to be enjoying their time participating in the simulation. As far as Indigenous Affairs was concerned it was a very successful conference. After a hectic two days in the rest of the ministries, the pleasant and civil proceedings resulting in mutual agreement is a very pleasant change in tone.


Consensus reached in Indigenous Affairs Meetings

2024-02-21 8:00 PM
Analysis: Kaz Kittmer

The first day of the 2024 Federal-Provincial Conference was mired in conflict and controversy. Many of the delegations were unhappy with the federal government for several reasons. With this in mind, it was a nice reprieve when the first few meetings of Indigenous affairs were civil, uneventful, and full of federal-provincial cooperation.

During the first committee meeting of the day, ministers were quick to exchange pleasantries and rally around the topic being discussed. Conversations were civil, with no voices being raised. The main proposal being addressed was the reduction of violence against Indigenous peoples. The representatives had a critical and lengthy exchange about realistic policies and the implementation of de-escalation training for police officers, as well as the idea of self-policing for Indigenous communities. Near the end of the meeting, the topic of the missing and murdered Indigenous women was also brought up. Consensus was made about the addition of extra resources to case investigation and victim or outreach to a victim's family. The suggestion for the creation of a missing persons database for Indigenous victims was also raised. As the meeting neared its end, the federal minister drafted a proposal.

Main points from the Fed proposal:

The addition of an additional year to police training with 6 months focused on in-class learning involving de-escalation and cultural training, a 6-month placement within an Indigenous reserve working with community members, biweekly reports on police activity, additional training completed every 6 months, the creation of a database for missing and murdered indigenous women, and the funding of additional resources for victim and victim family outreach. Ultimately, everyone agreed with the proposed draft, which will be officially passed at tomorrow's meeting.

The topics discussed at the second committee meeting were access to clean and safe drinking water, education, substance usage, and mental health. As with the morning meeting, the discussions were kept relatively civil, with only one instance of raised voices. Much of the exchanges were more lively, with provinces who kept mainly quiet during the morning meeting chiming in. Once again, proposals were drafted and voted upon with little to no disagreement. Both education and access to clean water will have bills signed tomorrow, while discussions on substance use and mental health will continue.

Main points from the proposals drafted:

Education: Increase in funding to scholarships, specialized classes, and extracurriculars for Indigenous students

Access to clean water: Communication and collaboration with Indigenous communities to find the best solution to fixing their individual water issues, possible federal subsidizing for emergency water supplies to impacted communities, including individual water filters or large jugs of clean water, and an annual report to ensure program effectiveness and transparency.

Many committee meetings today may have been plagued by heated discussions and disagreements, but Indigenous affairs came ready to solve issues. They recognized the importance of the problems they were facing and decided to work together to protect the first peoples of this country.


The Federal Approach to Reserve Drinking Water Advisories - Equal Parts Flawed and Financially Odd

2024-02-21 11:20 AM
Analysis: Faryal Ansari

With Canada being one of the world’s wealthiest countries that is globally considered to be one of the best regions to live, it becomes difficult to justify the existence of inequalities, and few are as extreme and apparent as the issue of drinking water advisories on Indigenous reserves nationwide.

Drinking Water Advisories (DWAs for short) are, in essence, a warning to the people of a particular area that they are not to drink their own water out of a concern for safety. On Indigenous reserves, these advisories arise from a variety of problems, including inadequate water treatment systems and water contamination. This does not account for the fact that water is harder to access on many reserves than in other parts of Canada.

An investigation by Human Rights Watch found that the drinking water on multiple reserves in the country commonly contained E. coli, uranium, and cancer-causing chemicals such as Trihalomethanes. Some of these harmful substances are emerging directly from the water source, while others are byproducts of faulty attempts at water treatment and filtration. With the increased physical and emotional toll that this issue has on Indigenous populations across the country, Human Rights Watch asserts that “the Canadian government has violated a range of international human rights obligations toward First Nations persons and communities by failing to remedy the severe water crisis.”

The real question we must ask is how our federal government plans to deal with this problem, and to what extent their method will help address its root causes.

The federal government has promised approximately 15 billion dollars towards rectifying the water crisis across Canada, of which only 2 billion will be controlled by the Assembly of First Nations. Further detailed in their approach is the subsidization of plumbing services for reserve residents along with the further construction of pipes leading to their homes, and what they have described as instilling “incentives and training for jobs in water treatment and wastewater management to increase the number of reserve residents running these facilities”. Without examining some of the more ambiguous aspects of these plans, including what these “incentives” are and how such massive amounts of funding will actually be used, the federal government has done a good job diversifying its approach in order to target multiple causes of the water crisis.

That being said, there appear to be some major pitfalls to this approach, one of which being that improving the actual quality of wastewater systems is not addressed, which, as described earlier by Human Rights Watch, is one of the chief causes of unsafe drinking water. Increasing the number of jobs in facilities that are not supported with adequate resources will not improve the quality of water on any reserve.

Another significant flaw in the federal approach to drinking water advisories is lack of attention towards the contamination of source water. Industrial activity near reserves has resulted in significant pollution of drinking water. In the federal government’s Ministry of Environment position paper, the discussion on current investments into non-renewable energy is shut, as what is described as a “cold stop” in such activities is currently “not available”, and there is not an intent for “old investments [to] be withdrawn completely”. In an economy that is built on “old investments”, there appears to be no hope for Indigenous peoples that the basic right to clean water and sanitation will be provided. It is the responsibility of the government to measure its actions in accordance with the impact they will have on vulnerable populations, a responsibility the federal government is currently failing to uphold.

As the federal government uses large amounts of funding to compensate for its lack of a critical approach, the issue of drinking water advisories remains to be solved. The United Nations Declaration on the Right of Indigenous Peoples describes how any activities related to water must be done with the “Free, Prior and Informed Consent and full participation in decision-making by [Indigenous] authorities and representatives designated by [Indigenous] Peoples”. If the federal government were to utilize cooperation with Indigenous leadership to create a system of quality assurance in water management and resource allocation, and expressed a willingness to employ traditional knowledge to a problem that impacts Indigenous peoples disproportionately, Canada would be one step closer to rectifying the water crisis. When asked about their approach to the problem and its ability to resist further human rights abuses, the federal government provided no comment.


Feds Accuse Assembly of First Nations of Disorganization Regarding Budget Issues

2024-02-21 10:30 AM
Fresh Reporting: Kaz Kittmer

Although the 57th annual Fed-Prov conference has yet to begin, there has already been some anger thrown in the federal government's direction.

On the morning of Friday, February 16th, the minister of Indigenous Affairs for the Assembly of First Nations received an email from a representative of the federal government inquiring as to the ministry's budget. This caused some confusion within the Assembly as they had not been allocated a budget from the federal government for the conference. Upon hearing that the Indigenous Affairs minister had no budget details due to the federal government not designating the Assembly a budget and that the minister and National Chief assumed money allocation was the responsibility of the government, they briskly responded that "the budget for each Province and Territory has already been set and sent out," and that the minister should discuss the budget for Indigenous Affairs with their premier.

The assembly of First Nations lacks a premiere - as would be had by a province or territory - but instead has a National chief, as it is a special interest group and not an entity of any part of the Canadian government. This should be a fact well known to the federal representative, and regardless of whether they did not know or chose not to address the leader of the Assembly of First Nations correctly, it was seen as a sign of disrespect. To add to the issue, throughout the correspondence between the minister and representative, the Indigenous affairs minister’s name was misspelled twice, and the National Chief was regarded with the incorrect title, heightening the disrespect felt by not only the minister but the Assembly as a whole.

Towards the end of the exchanges, the tone from the federal representative did shift, and they ended up thanking the Indigenous Affairs minister for their patience regarding the issue. This shift only occurred after they had been informed about the federal government's own lack of budget allocation for the Assembly of First Nations, making it impossible for the National Chief to divide a budget between ministries, including the Ministry of Indigenous Affairs.

This whole event has left the Assembly of First Nations members feeling neglected and angry. The minister of Indigenous Affairs did not appreciate being wrongly confronted for carelessness by the Federal Government on an issue that was initially caused by the Federal Government itself. Some Assembly of First Nations members feel that the government is experiencing disorganization just days before the conference. However, many in the Assembly are now asking the big question: Why has the Assembly of First Nations not been given a budget for this year's conference?